---
type: concept
title: The Three Review Paths
aliases:
  - Path A-B-C
  - async review paths
  - review experience
  - Start Here
modified: 2026-04-07
tags:
  - navigation
  - review-experience
  - async-review
  - adoption-case
---

# The Three Review Paths

> SuiteCentral 2.0's executive package supports three guided review paths — A (Executive, 11-12 min), B (Leadership, 25 min, **recommended**), and C (Deep Proof, 50 min) — each engineered to deliver the reviewer to the same artifact: the Pilot Decision Memo.

## What it is

The package's **async-first review experience**. Squire executives are not always available for a live presenter walkthrough, so the package provides three pre-built guided paths a reviewer can walk through on their own. Each path is structured as an ordered list of steps, each step is timed, and every path terminates in the same place: a pilot decision.

The entry point is the [[pages/entities/demo-site|Start Here page]] at `/Squire-Executive-Package-v2/15-START-HERE-ASYNC-STANDALONE`.

## Why it matters (to the adoption case)

The structure reveals something important about the pitch: **the package is designed to function without a salesperson in the room.** That is unusual and load-bearing for the adoption case. It signals:

- **Confidence in the artifacts.** If the package needed a presenter to land, having three guided async paths would be a liability. They aren't.
- **Respect for executive time.** Path A is engineered for the busiest reviewer (12 minutes); Path C is for the most thorough (50 minutes). The three paths let each role spend exactly as much time as their job requires.
- **A pre-committed decision shape.** The target outcome is named upfront: "capture a clear approve, defer, or deep-dive next step." This is anti-FOMO framing — the reviewer is told the only acceptable outcomes, none of which is "I'll think about it."

## The three paths

### Path A: Executive (11-12 minutes)

For the executive who has 12 minutes between meetings.

| # | Step | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Executive Outcomes | 2 min |
| 2 | Executive Reel (Narrated) | 4 min |
| 3 | Context Sidecar Highlight (Narrated) | 1-2 min |
| 4 | [[pages/concepts/claim-proof-matrix|Claim-to-Proof Matrix]] | 2 min |
| 5 | **Pilot Decision Memo** | 2 min |

Source: [[sources/15-start-here-async-standalone]]. None of the named source artifacts (Executive Outcomes, Executive Reel, Context Sidecar Highlight, Claim-to-Proof Matrix, Pilot Decision Memo) is yet ingested as a wiki page — they are flagged as high-priority next ingests.

### Path B: Leadership (25 minutes, RECOMMENDED)

The path the email template asks reviewers to take. This is the canonical "leadership team walkthrough" experience.

| # | Step | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Demo Hub (Watch / Click / Read entry) | — |
| 2 | Watch playlist: Storyboard Clips | 8 min |
| 3 | Module Library (16 modules) — footprint validation | 3 min |
| 4 | [[pages/concepts/claim-proof-matrix|Claim-to-Proof Matrix]] | 4 min |
| 5 | Objections and Answers | 2 min |
| 6 | **Role page** — pick one: [[pages/role-briefs/cfo|CFO]], [[pages/role-briefs/cto|CTO]], or [[pages/role-briefs/coo|COO]] | 4 min |
| 7 | 30/60/90 Pilot Plan | 2 min |
| 8 | **Pilot Decision Memo** | 2 min |

Source: [[sources/15-start-here-async-standalone]]. **Step 6 is a parallel choice**: each reviewer reads the role brief that matches their job, not all three. This is a meaningful detail — see "Role briefs as a parallel choice" below.

### Path C: Deep Proof (50 minutes)

For the technical reviewer or skeptic who needs to verify everything.

| # | Step | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Full Watch playlist | 20 min |
| 2 | Module Library (16 modules) — verify breadth by function area | 5 min |
| 3 | Technical Proof | 10 min |
| 4 | Compliance Dashboard + Oracle comparison | 10 min |
| 5 | **Pilot Decision Memo** | 5 min |

Source: [[sources/15-start-here-async-standalone]].

## Role briefs as a parallel choice

This is the most consequential structural insight in the source. The CFO/CTO/COO role briefs are presented as **step 6 of Path B**, and they are **a parallel choice** — a reviewer picks the one that matches their role rather than reading all three.

This contradicts an earlier wiki framing (now corrected): the [[pages/role-briefs/cfo|CFO]], [[pages/role-briefs/cto|CTO]], and [[pages/role-briefs/coo|COO]] role brief pages were originally written as if the three were a triptych "designed to be read together." The actual product positions them as alternatives.

The synthesis-style "read all three" view is still useful for one specific case: a reader who must reconcile all three perspectives — for example, the CEO of Squire & Company, who has to satisfy all three role concerns simultaneously. But in the standard async review flow, each person reads the one that matches their job.

## The 6-URL email template

The Start Here page also defines a canonical 6-URL flow for distributing the package by email. The recommended subject line is *"SuiteCentral 2.0 package review - decision requested"* and the body asks the recipient to walk through Path B. The 6 URLs are:

1. `/Squire-Executive-Package-v2/15-START-HERE-ASYNC-STANDALONE.html`
2. `/squire-v2-media-demo/index.html` (Demo Hub)
3. `/squire-v2-media-demo/watch/videos/index.html` (Watch playlist)
4. `/Squire-Executive-Package-v2/22-MODULE-LIBRARY-STANDALONE.html`
5. `/Squire-Executive-Package-v2/09-CLAIM-PROOF-MATRIX-STANDALONE.html`
6. `/Squire-Executive-Package-v2/16-PILOT-DECISION-MEMO-STANDALONE.html`

The template asks for "pilot approval decision after completing the review" as the requested outcome.

## NotebookLM Companion

Each of the three paths is paired with a "NotebookLM Companion" link for external Q&A. This is the same notebook this wiki is built from (`ca3bd54b-c240-4432-93c3-545099bf719b`). The product positions the notebook as the *deeper Q&A layer* underneath the curated path — when a reviewer has questions the path doesn't answer, they go to the notebook (or, soon, this wiki).

## Sources

- [[sources/15-start-here-async-standalone]] — primary source, all 11 path-structure claims