Source: 05-TECHNICAL-PROOF.md (condensed bullet version)

What this source is

A condensed bullet-point version of the technical proof document — NOT a renumbering of 04-technical-proof. Both 04-TECHNICAL-PROOF.md (full 4-tier feature inventory) and 05-TECHNICAL-PROOF.md (compact 6-section summary) exist as separate files in the Preston-Test repo.

Referenced by 09-claim-proof-matrix claim #7 (“Platform quality is enterprise-grade”) at URL /Squire-Executive-Package-v2/05-TECHNICAL-PROOF-STANDALONE.html — so this is the version used in the live review flow, not 04. 04 is the deeper internal document.

Key claims

1. Test Infrastructure — 9,510 total (9,476 passed, 34 skipped), 100% executed pass rate, 419 suites, 64.59% code coverage. Consistent with 04-technical-proof and 26-canonical-metrics-and-wording.
2. 4 verified AI providers: OpenAI GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet, OpenRouter, LMStudio (local). Field mapping accuracy: 95%+. Matches 04-TECHNICAL-PROOF and is consistent with canonical wording.
3. 5 connectors listed: NetSuite (OAuth 1.0), Salesforce (OAuth 2.0), Shopify (OAuth 2.0), Oracle (REST/JDBC), Business Central (OData v4). → CONTRADICTS 26-canonical-metrics-and-wording which names 6 connectors: NetSuite, Business Central, Salesforce, HubSpot, ShipStation, Oracle. This source has Shopify (not in canonical) and is missing HubSpot and ShipStation.
4. 12 core modules listed exactly matching 22-module-library (SupplierCentral through ContractCentral). Consistent.
5. Infrastructure stack: Terraform + Helm + Kubernetes + GitHub Actions + AES-256-GCM + PostgreSQL + SQLite. Consistent with 04-technical-proof.
6. Production Readiness: “100% Complete” across Core Platform, AI Orchestration. Documentation at 85%. “Remaining Work: 36-60 hours” — this is a notable tension: if the platform is 100% complete, the 36-60 hours of remaining work is documentation polish, not missing features.

Pages updated by this ingest

Updated (2 existing pages):

• claim-proof-matrix — clarified that “05-TECHNICAL-PROOF” is a real separate document (not a renumbering) and 09-claim-proof-matrix correctly references it
• canonical-metrics — added Shopify connector drift as a documented known-stale claim in 05-TECHNICAL-PROOF.md

Cross-references / contradictions found

• Shopify drift (NEW, flagged): this source lists Shopify as a 3rd connector. 26-canonical-metrics-and-wording is authoritative and names a different 6-connector set (NetSuite, Business Central, Salesforce, HubSpot, ShipStation, Oracle) — no Shopify. Possible explanations: (a) Shopify was an earlier connector that was replaced or merged; (b) 05-TECHNICAL-PROOF is stale and should be refreshed to match canonical; (c) Shopify is an informal or in-development connector that doesn’t yet qualify as “production-demonstrated” per the canonical wording. Most likely (b) — this file is older than 26-CANONICAL-METRICS and drifted. Since 05 is what the claim-proof matrix points at, a reviewer walking Path C will see the stale Shopify claim, which contradicts the canonical pitch.
• “100% Complete” + “Remaining Work: 36-60 hours” is internally tensioned. Resolution: 100% complete refers to Core Platform + AI Orchestration features; 36-60 hours refers to Documentation at 85%. Not a contradiction if read carefully, but the juxtaposition is awkward.
• Resolves the “05-vs-04” numbering question: NOT a renumbering. Both files exist side by side. 04 is the comprehensive internal technical proof (~4,400 chars, 4 tiers of features, architecture, LOC, CRUD, NetSuite sandbox); 05 is the compact public-facing bullet summary (~1,300 chars, 6 sections, listed numbers only). The claim-proof matrix correctly references 05-TECHNICAL-PROOF-STANDALONE.html as the Path C verification artifact.

Notes

• This source is significantly shorter than 04-technical-proof (1,300 vs 4,400 chars). The trade-off: 05 is easier to skim in the Path C 10-minute slot; 04 has the actual source-file paths, version numbers (v2.5, v3.2, v3.3, v3.4), and NetSuite sandbox ID that make verification feasible.
• The Shopify drift should be either (a) reconciled by updating 05-TECHNICAL-PROOF.md in the repo to match 26-CANONICAL-METRICS, or (b) flagged to the product owner for a manual reconciliation. It’s a wording-governance issue per the canonical wording style guide’s governance requirement: “Any document added to NotebookLM should conform to this file before packaging.” — 05 doesn’t currently conform.
• The “36-60 hours remaining work” figure is the closest thing to a completion timeline in the corpus — but it’s explicitly about documentation polish, not feature work.