Source: 15-START-HERE-ASYNC-STANDALONE (live demo page)

What this source is

The navigation hub of the live SuiteCentral 2.0 demo at demo.kstratmdconsulting.com. It is the entry point for an async-first review experience — the page a reviewer is sent to when there is no live presenter to walk them through the package.

It is structurally a menu page, not a content page. It defines three guided review paths (A/B/C), each engineered to deliver the reviewer to the same artifact (the Pilot Decision Memo). It also contains a 60-second “production-readiness snapshot” (the current test/coverage/scale numbers, not the slide-vintage ones) and an email template for distributing the package by email.

This is the first live-site source in the wiki — all prior sources were .md files inside the notebook. It was added to the notebook on 2026-04-07 via notebook_add_url.

Key claims

1. Async-first review is a supported mode. The package is engineered to be reviewed without a live presenter. → three-review-paths
2. Target outcome is “approve / defer / deep-dive.” Each path is designed to end in a concrete, named pilot decision (not vibes). → three-review-paths
3. Three guided paths exist: A (Executive, 11-12 min), B (Leadership, 25 min, recommended), and C (Deep Proof, 50 min). All three end at the Pilot Decision Memo. → three-review-paths
4. Path A is 5 steps: Executive Outcomes → Executive Reel (Narrated) → Context Sidecar Highlight (Narrated) → Claim-to-Proof Matrix → Pilot Decision Memo. → three-review-paths
5. Path B is 8 steps: Demo Hub (Watch/Click/Read) → Storyboard Clips (8 min) → Module Library 16 modules (3 min) → Claim-to-Proof Matrix (4 min) → Objections-and-Answers (2 min) → CFO/CTO/COO role page (4 min, parallel choice) → 30/60/90 Pilot Plan (2 min) → Pilot Decision Memo (2 min). → three-review-paths and cfo / cto / coo
6. Path C is 5 steps: Full Watch playlist (20 min) → Module Library 16 modules (5 min) → Technical Proof (10 min) → Compliance Dashboard + Oracle comparison (10 min) → Pilot Decision Memo (5 min). → three-review-paths
7. The Demo Hub is a three-track structure: Watch (narrated proof) / Click (interactive walkthroughs) / Read (executive summaries). Lives at /squire-v2-media-demo/index.html. → demo-site
8. Role briefs are step 6 of Path B, presented as a parallel choice by role. Reviewers pick the brief that matches their job (CFO, CTO, or COO). → cfo, cto, coo (correction to existing wording on those pages)
9. The Pilot Decision Memo at /Squire-Executive-Package-v2/16-PILOT-DECISION-MEMO-STANDALONE.html is the artifact every path delivers to. Not yet ingested. → demo-site and flagged as a high-priority next ingest
10. Each path has a NotebookLM Companion for external Q&A — the same notebook this wiki ingests from (ca3bd54b-...). → demo-site
11. The async email template defines a canonical 6-URL distribution flow: Start Here → Demo Hub → Watch playlist → Module Library → Claim-to-Proof Matrix → Pilot Decision Memo. → three-review-paths
12. Suite pass rate (CURRENT vintage): 100% (391/391 suites). → production-proof
13. Test counts (CURRENT vintage): 9,364/9,394 (30 skipped). → production-proof
14. Coverage (CURRENT vintage): 64.48% statements. → production-proof
15. Repository scale (CURRENT vintage): 2,282 tracked files / ~854K text LOC snapshot. → production-proof
16. Decision Path at /19-DECISION-PATH-STANDALONE.html is a role-based routing to a decision artifact. Likely the answer to the still-open “who leads the pilot approval” question. Not yet ingested. → demo-site
17. Live Demo Setup at /18-LIVE-DEMO-SETUP-STANDALONE.html is the local server-backed version for reviewers who want deeper technical access (alternative to a GitHub repo invite). → demo-site
18. Engineering Scale & Quality at /23-ENGINEERING-SCALE-QUALITY-STANDALONE.html is the full benchmark narrative behind the 60-second quality snapshot. Not yet ingested. → demo-site

Pages updated by this ingest

Created (2 new pages):

• three-review-paths — captures the A/B/C path structure as the canonical review experience
• demo-site — entity page for the live demo.kstratmdconsulting.com artifact

Updated (4 existing pages):

• production-proof — added the current-vintage numbers (9,364/9,394, 100% 391/391 suites, 64.48% coverage, 2,282 files / ~854K LOC) as a third formally-ingested source. These match the Preston-Test repo README.md numbers that were previously noted as “implicit, not yet formally ingested.”
• cfo — corrected “designed to be read together” to “parallel choice in Path B”
• cto — same correction
• coo — same correction

Notable quotes

“If no live presenter is available, use one of these guided paths. Each path is designed to end in a concrete pilot decision.”

“Target outcome: capture a clear approve, defer, or deep-dive next step.”

“Start with Watch for narrated proof, Click for interactive walkthroughs, and Read for executive summaries.” — Demo Hub guidance.

(The full content of the page is quite short — the cached raw file is at raw/notebooklm/15-start-here-async-standalone.md in the vault.)

Cross-references / contradictions found

• Mixed vintages within the executive package (NOT a contradiction, but important): this Start Here page cites the current Preston-Test numbers (9,364/9,394 with 30 skipped, 100% 409/409, 64.48% coverage). The slide script 01-executive-summary and the CTO role brief 11-role-brief-cto both cite the slide-vintage numbers (9,038/9,061 with 23 skipped). Conclusion: Start Here has been refreshed since the slide-vintage assets were created; the role briefs and exec summary script have not. The package is internally inconsistent on this point. The math: +197 passing tests, +7 skipped tests, +204 total tests added between vintages. The skipped-test ratio is essentially flat (0.25% slide-vintage vs 0.32% current).
• The role briefs are NOT meant to be read as a triptych — confirmed by this source. They are a parallel choice in step 6 of Path B (the leadership path). Each reviewer reads the one that matches their role. This requires a wording fix on cfo, cto, and coo — all three currently say “designed to be read together,” which was my inference from the role-brief batch ingest (it was a reasonable inference at the time, and the synthesis page is still useful for the case where one reviewer must reconcile all three).
• NotebookLM scrape is structurally lossy on this page: many of the inline link URLs in the cached raw text resolve incorrectly (e.g., every link in Path A points to 23-ENGINEERING-SCALE-QUALITY-STANDALONE.html). User verified on 2026-04-07 that the live site links are correct (“Executive Outcomes” actually links to /Squire-Executive-Package-v2/00-EXECUTIVE-OUTCOMES-STANDALONE). Conclusion: do NOT trust inline URLs from this scrape. The cached raw text in raw/notebooklm/15-start-here-async-standalone.md should not be used as a source of truth for which path step links to which page — only for the list of step names and durations.
• Hint at unread sources revealed by this page (high-priority candidates for next ingest):
  • /16-PILOT-DECISION-MEMO-STANDALONE.html — THE decision artifact every path leads to
  • /19-DECISION-PATH-STANDALONE.html — role-based routing, likely answers “who leads approval”
  • /00-EXECUTIVE-OUTCOMES-STANDALONE.html — Path A step 1 (verified URL from user spot-check)
  • /23-ENGINEERING-SCALE-QUALITY-STANDALONE.html — full quality benchmark narrative
  • /squire-v2-media-demo/index.html — the Demo Hub itself (Watch/Click/Read entry)
  • /squire-v2-media-demo/oracle-comparison.html — the Oracle comparison artifact for Path C

Notes

• This is the first live-site source in the wiki. The provenance line source_url: in the frontmatter records the live URL it came from, in case the live site is updated and we need to re-ingest.
• The ~6 KB content size is misleading — most of the substance is structural (path definitions and navigation), not narrative. The 60-second quality snapshot is the only substantive content block.
• The “Optional deeper technical access” footer mentions GitHub repo invites and the Live Demo Setup page. This is an indirect signal that the demo site has a private/gated path for serious reviewers, distinct from the public hosted demo.
• The page mentions “Demo Hub details” and “More ▼” — implying there’s an expandable/accordion section in the live page that NotebookLM may or may not have captured. The current content includes the Demo Hub section, so it appears to have been captured.